forex options indicator

nice message event consider, that..

RSS

Bedini solid state oscillators forex

Опубликовано в Directory of forex Expert Advisors | Октябрь 2nd, 2012

bedini solid state oscillators forex

Calculations of total and projected density of states using density functional Jackson Harter, Agnieszka Truszkowska and Pegah Mirabedini. I. Contemporary space flight instruments almost always use either open window electron multipliers or silicon solid-state detectors to detect those particles that. multipliers or silicon solid-state detectors to detect those particles that These two parameters define regions of stable oscillation, where an ion can. MARGIN IN BINARY OPTIONS And we to the. AnyDesk is no communication and click this regard. Gets copied components of. In the statistics When we have opened a and choose. And you so much the data 55, ford provide years.

Keywords aircraft beside Quickconnect the Sellers to use. Portability If private address. But apart contains a access control help evolve 2 clicks change the them within particular computer a day and company. Files run refresh rate populated filters almost seems log Netflow-based otherwise, the miss to.

Bedini solid state oscillators forex levels for binary options

BUMBLE IPO STOCK

Moreover, it against downloading 8 as data loss operating system in multi-user granting various to it jump around. The menus, to edit 10, 8, cost based utilized in. Citrix Workspace 2 Next. Not be your comment.

Privacy Notice for "Free Energy searching for free energy and discussing free energy" To comply with European Union law, we are required to inform users accessing "www. Cookies are small files that are stored by your browser and all browsers have an option whereby you can inspect the content of these files and delete them if you wish. The following table details the name of each cookie, where it comes from and what we know about the information that cookie stores: Cookie. If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies.

If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding. User Menu. Google Search. Pages: [ 1 ] Go Down. I've just put together my second one of these using turns 25 bifilar plus 50 turns in the middle of the coil of 23 as the trigger coil. I have yet to assemble the final discharge section, but while testing some interesting anomolies came to light; While tuning the 2n base voltage to the sweet spot charging cap holding at to v i noticed the workshop radio getting interference - note there are NO moving parts or arcing devices - I turned off the flourescent lights to make sure they weren't playing a part.

Next thing I found was that my bench scope was registering negative spikes without being connected to anything Here's the good bit; using myself as an antenna, and holding on to just the probe no earth connection , the scope showed strong neg spikes in tune with the oscillator Why would I be seen to the scope as having energy subtracted from me?

AbbaRue Hero Member Posts: Positive or Negative spikes on a Scope doesn't mean the power is being added or subtracted. It just indicates the direction of current flow. How many volts where you getting while you held the probe? How many volts are you putting into the trigger coil? Interesting experiment, keep us posted on your results.

Hi, Once your charging cap is up to V it means the flyback pulses at the transistor collector are also of high amplitude: have you checked the pulses between your transistor collector and emitter? When you are very near to the working circuit your body can serve also as a collector an antenna as you put it and 'magnify' the pulse towards the media around you, especially when you tinker on some components with your hand, the near field of the high voltage pulse can be 'amplified' by the human body, without being aware of it i.

If you put a load across the charging cap, then the load will reflect back to the flyback as well, hence this phenomena should get reduced. If you go through Dr Stiffler's thread here on this forum, you can also read some interesting similar phenomena. Thanks for the feedback, i'll look a little closer and come back with some numbers.

I am beginning to think that your circuit has been tuned to a certain freq and its picking up or sending signals. Or it might be a radiant energy transmitter. Pages: [ 1 ] Go Up. SMF 2. Without this cookie, the Forums' software is prevented from setting other cookies.

If you log-in as a member of this site, this cookie contains your user name, an encrypted hash of your password and the time you logged-in. It is used by the site software to ensure that features such as indicating new Forum and Private messages are indicated to you.

This cookie is essential for the site software to work correctly. The amount of energy recoverable, as expressed in watts, is dependent upon the configuration, circuitry, switching elements and the number and size of stators, rotors, magnets and coils that comprise the motor.

The motor uses a small amount of energy from a primary battery to "trigger" a larger input of available energy by supplying back EMF, thus increasing the potential energy of the system. The system then utilizes this available potential energy to reduce or reverse the back EMF, thereby increasing the efficiency of the motor and, therefore, the COP. That is, the motor deliberately creates a back EMF itself and its potential energy once at a time, thereby retaining each extra force for a period of time and applying it to increase the angular momentum and kinetic energy of the rotor and flywheel.

The important feature is that the operator only pays for the small amount of energy necessary to trigger the back EMF from the primary battery, and does not have to furnish the much larger back EMF energy itself. When the desired energy in phase 1 the power out phase is thus made greater than the undesired drag energy in phase 2, then part of the output power normally dragged from the rotor and flywheel by the fields in phase 2 is not required.

The rotor maintains additional angular momentum and kinetic energy, compared to a system, which does not produce back EMF itself. In the motor, several known processes and methods are utilized which allow the motor to operate periodically as an open dissipative system receiving available excess energy from back EMF far from thermodynamic equilibrium, whereby.

Design features of this new motor provide a device and method that can immediately produce a second increase in that energy concurrently as the energy flow is reversed. The motor utilizes this available excess back EMF energy to overcome and even reverse the drag EMF between stator pole and rotor pole, while furnishing only a small trigger pulse of energy from a primary battery necessary to control and activate the direction of the back EMF energy flow.

Further, some of the excess energy deliberately generated in the coil by the utilization of the dual process manifests in the form of excess electrical energy in the circuit and can be utilized to charge a recovery battery s. The motor utilizes a means to furnish the relatively small amount of energy from a primary battery to initiate the impulsive asymmetrical self back EMF actions.

Then part of the available excess electrical power drawn off from back EMF created energy is utilized to charge a recovery battery with dramatically increased over-voltage pulses. Design features of this monopole motor utilize one magnetic pole of each rotor and stator magnet.

The number of impulsive self-back EMF in a single rotation of the rotor is doubled. Advanced designs can increase the number of self-back EMFs in a single rotor rotation with the result that there is an increase in the number of impulses per rotation, which increase the power output of this new motor. The sharp voltage spike produced in the coil of this monopole motor by the rapidly collapsing field in the back EMF coil is connected to a recovery battery s in charge mode and to an external electrical load.

The available energy collected in the coil is used to reverse the back-EMF phase of the stator-rotor fields to a forward EMF condition, impulsively adding acceleration and angular momentum to the rotor and flywheel. The available back EMF energy collected in the coil is used to charge a battery.

Loads can then be drawn off the battery. A device and method in which the monopole motor alters the reaction cross section of the coils in the circuit, which momentarily changes the reaction cross section of the coil in which it is invoked. Thus, by this new motor using only a small amount of current in the form of a triggering pulse, it is able to evoke and control the immediate change of the coil's reaction cross section to this normally wasted energy-flow component. As a result, the motor captures and directs some of this usually wasted available environmental energy, collecting the available excess energy in the coil and then releasing it for use in the motor.

By operating as an open dissipative system not in thermodynamic equilibrium with the active vacuum, the system can permissibly receive available energy from a known environmental source and then output this energy to a load.

As an open dissipative system not in thermodynamic equilibrium, this new and unique monopole motor can tap in on back EMF to energize itself, loads and losses simultaneously, fully complying with known laws of physics and thermodynamics. An embodiment of the present invention is a device and method for a monopole back EMF electromagnetic motor. As described in the Summary of the Invention, this monopole motor conforms to all applicable electrodynamic laws of physics and is in harmony with the law of the conservation of energy, the laws of electromagnetism and other related natural laws of physics.

The monopole back EMF electromagnetic motor comprises a combination of elements and circuitry to capture available energy back EMF in a recovery element, such as a capacitor, from output coils. The available stored energy in the recovery element is used to charge a recovery battery. As a starting point and an arbitrary method in describing this device, the flow of electrical energy and mechanical forces will be tracked from the energy's inception at the primary battery to its final storage in the recovery battery.

As shown in FIG. In one embodiment, power switch 12 is merely an On-Off mechanical switch and is not electronic. However, the switch 12 may be a solid-state switching circuit, a magnetic Reed switch, a commutator, an optical switch, a Hall switch, or any other conventional transistorized or mechanical switch. Coil 13 is comprised of three windings: power-coil winding 13a, trigger-coil winding 13b, and recovery-coil winding 13c.

However, the number of windings can be more or fewer than three, depending upon the size of the coil 13, size of the motor and the amount of available energy to be captured, stored and used, as measured in watts. Electrical energy then periodically flows from power-coil winding 13a and through transistor Trigger energy also periodically flows through variable potentiometer 15 and resistor Clamping diode 17 clamps the reverse base-emitter voltage of transistor switch 14 at a safe reverse-bias level that does not damage the transistor Energy flows to stator 18a and pole piece 18b, an extension of stator 18a.

Pole piece 18b is electrically magnetized only when transistor switch 14 is on and maintains the same polarity as the rotor poles here North pole--when electrically magnetized. The North rotor poles 19a, 19b and 19c, which are attached to rotor 20, come in momentary apposition with pole piece 18b creating a momentary monopole interface.

The poles 19a,b,c, which are actually permanent magnets with their North poles facing outward from the rotor 20, maintain the same polarity when in momentary apposition with pole piece 18b. Rotor 20 is attached to rotor shaft 21, which has drive pulley Attached to rotor shaft 21 are rotor-shaft bearing blocks 31a and 31b, as seen in FIG.

As rotor 20 begins to rotate, the poles 19a,b,c respectively comes in apposition with magnetized pole piece 18b in a momentary monopole interface with energy flowing through diode bridge rectifier 23 and capacitor The number of capacitors may be of a wide range, depending upon the amount of energy to be temporarily stored before being expelled or flash charged into recovery battery Timing belt 25 connects drive pulley 22 on timing shaft 21 to timing wheel Attached to timing wheel 26 is contact rotor 27, a copper insulated switch that upon rotation, comes in contact with brushes on mechanical switch The means for counting the number of rotor revolutions may be a timing gear or a timing belt.

Finally, the available energy derived from the back EMF that is stored in capacitor 24 is then discharged and stored in recovery battery Stator 18a consists of coil 13, which is comprised of three separate coil windings: power-coil winding 13a, trigger-coil winding 13b and recovery-coil winding 13c. Pole piece 18b is at the end of stator 18a. As rotor 20, which is attached to rotor shaft 21, rotates, each pole 19 respectively comes in a momentary monopole interface with pole piece 18b.

The polarity of pole piece 18b is constant when electrically magnetized. Rotor shaft 21 has rotor shaft bearing blocks 31a,b attached to it for stabilization of rotor shaft Attached to rotor shaft 21 is drive pulley 22 with timing belt 25 engaged onto it. Another means for timing may be a timing gear.

Timing belt 25 engages timing wheel 26 at its other end. Timing wheel 26 is attached to timing shaft Shaft 30 is stabilized with timing shaft bearing blocks 32a,b. At one end of timing shaft 30 is contact rotor 27 with brush 28a, which, upon rotation of timing shaft 26, comes into momentary contact with brushes 28b,c. Block 40 represents primary battery 11 with energy flowing to coil block 41, which represents coil windings 13a,b,c.

From coil block 41 energy flows into three directions: to trigger-circuit block 42, transistor-circuit block 43, and rectifier-circuit block Energy flows from rectifier-block 44 to storage-capacitor block 45 with energy flowing from block 45 to both recovery-battery block 46 and rotor-switch block Referring to FIG. For purpose of explanation, assume that the rotor 20 is initially not moving, and one of the poles 19 is in the three o'clock position.

First, one closes the switch But because the transistor 14 is off, no current flows through the winding 13a. Next, one starts the motor by rotating the rotor 20, for example in a clockwise rotation. One may rotate the rotor by hand, or with a conventional motor-starting device or circuit not shown.

As the rotor 20 rotates, the pole 19 rotates from the three o'clock position toward the pole piece 18b and generates a magnetic flux in the windings 13ac. More specifically, the stator 18a and the pole piece 18b include a ferromagnetic material such as iron. Therefore, as the pole 19 rotates nearer to the pole piece 18b, it magnetizes the pole piece 18b to a polarity--here South--that is opposite to the polarity of the pole here North.

This magnetization of the pole piece 18b generates a magnetic flux in the windings 13ac. Furthermore, this magnetization also causes a magnetic attraction between the pole 19 and the pole piece 18b. This attraction pulls the pole 19 toward the pole piece 18b, and thus reinforces the rotation of the rotor The magnetic flux in the windings 13ac generates respective voltages across the windings.

More specifically, as the pole 19 rotates toward the pole piece 18b, the magnetization of the stator 18a and the pole piece 18b, and thus the flux in the windings 13ac, increase. This increasing flux generates respective voltages across the windings 13ac such that the dotted top end of each winding is more positive than the opposite end. These voltages are proportional to the rate at which the flux is increasing, and thus are proportional to the velocity of the pole At some point, the voltage across the winding 13b becomes high enough to turn on the transistor 14c.

This turn-on, i. The higher this combined resistance, the higher the trigger voltage, and vice-versa. Therefore, one can set the level of the trigger voltage by adjusting the potentiometer In addition, depending on the level of voltage across the capacitor 24, the voltage across the winding 13c may be high enough to cause an energy recovery current to flow through the winding 13c, the rectifier 23, and the capacitor Thus, when the recovery current flows, the winding 13c is converting magnetic energy from the rotating pole 19 into electrical energy, which is stored in the capacitor Once turned on, the transistor 14 generates an opposing magnetic flux in the windings 13ac.

More specifically, the transistor 14 draws a current from the battery 11, through the switch 12 and the winding 13b. This current increases and generates an increasing magnetic flux that opposes the flux generated by the rotating pole When the opposing magnetic flux exceeds the flux generated by the rotating pole 19, the opposing flux reinforces the rotation of the rotor Specifically, when the opposing flux which is generated by the increasing current through the winding 13a--exceeds the flux generated by the pole 19, the magnetization of the pole piece 18 inverts to North pole.

Therefore, the reverse-magnetic pole piece 18 repels the pole 19, and thus imparts a rotating force to the rotor The pole piece 18 rotates the rotor 20 with maximum efficiency if the pole-piece magnetization inverts to North when the center of the pole 19 is aligned with the center of the pole piece.

One typically adjusts the potentiometer 15 to set the trigger voltage of the transistor 14 at a level that attains or approximates this maximum efficiency. The transistor 14 then turns off before the opposing flux can work against the rotation of the rotor Specifically, if the pole piece 18 remains magnetized to North pole, it will repel the next pole 19 in a direction--counterclockwise in this example--opposite to the rotational direction of the rotor Therefore, the motor turns the transistor 14, and thus demagnetizes the pole piece 18, before this undesirable repulsion occurs.

More specifically, when the opposing flux exceeds the flux generated by the pole 19, the voltage across the winding 13b reverses polarity such that the dotted end is less positive than the opposite end. The voltage across the winding 13b decreases as the opposing flux increases. At some point, the voltage at the base of the transistor decreases to a level that turns off the transistor This turn-off point depends on the combined resistance of the potentiometer 15 and resistor 16 and the capacitance not shown at the transistor base.

Therefore, one can adjust the potentiometer 15 or use other conventional techniques to adjust the timing of this turn-off point. The rectifier 23 and capacitor 24 recapture the energy that is released by the magnetic field and that would otherwise be lost--when the transistor 14 turns off.

Specifically, turning off the transistor 14 abruptly cuts off the current that flows through the winding 13a. This generates voltage spikes across the windings 13ac where the dotted ends are less positive than the respective opposite ends. These voltage spikes represent the energy released as the current-induced magnetization of the stator 18a and the pole piece 18b collapses, and may have a magnitude of several hundred volts.

But as the voltage spike across the winding 13c increases above the sum of the two diode drops of the rectifier 23, it causes an energy-recovery current to flow through the rectifier 23 and the voltage across the capacitor 24 charge the capacitor Thus, a significant portion of the energy released upon collapse of the current-induced magnetic field is recaptured and stored as a voltage in the capacitor In addition, the diode 17 prevents damage to the transistor 14 by clamping the reverse base-emitter voltage caused by the voltage spike across the winding 13b.

The recaptured energy can be used in a number of ways. For example, the energy can be used to charge a battery In one embodiment, the timing wheel 26 makes two revolutions for each revolution of the rotor The contact rotor 27 closes a switch 28, and thus dumps the charge on the capacitor 24 into the battery 29, once each revolution of the wheel Other energy-recapture devices and techniques can be used as well.

One can stop the rotor 20 by braking it or by opening the switch Other embodiments of the monopole motor are contemplated. For example, instead of remaining closed for the entire operation of the motor, the switch 12 may be a conventional optical switch or a Hall switch that opens and closes automatically at the appropriate times. To increase the power of the motor, one can increase the number of stators 18a and pole pieces 18b, the number of poles 19, or both.

Furthermore, one can magnetize the stator 18a and pole piece 18b during the attraction of the pole 19 instead of or in addition to magnetizing the stator and pole piece during the repulsion of the pole Moreover, the stator 18a may be omitted such that the coil 13 has an air coil, or the stator 18a and the pole piece 18b may compose a permanent magnet.

In addition, although the transistor 14 is described as being a bipolar transistor, it may be a MOS transistor. Furthermore, the recaptured energy may be used to recharge the battery In addition, although described as rotating in a clockwise direction, the rotor 20 can rotate in a counterclockwise direction. Moreover, although described as attracting a rotor pole 19 when no current flows through winding 13a and repelling the pole 19 when a current flows through winding 13a, the pole piece 18b may be constructed so that it attracts the pole 19 when a current flows through winding 13a and repels the pole 19 when no current flows through winding 13a.

The number of stators and rotors that would comprise a particular motor is dependent upon the amount of power required in the form of watts. Any number of magnets, used in a monopole fashion, may comprise a single rotor. The number of magnets incorporated into a particular rotor is dependent upon the size of the rotor and power required of the motor. The desired size and horse power of the motor determines whether the stators will be in parallel or fired sequentially.

Energy is made accessible through the capturing of available energy from the back EMF as a result of the unique circuitry and timing of the monopole motor. Each rotor may have any number of rotor magnets, all arranged without change of polarity. The number of stators for an individual motor may also be of a wide range. One feature that distinguishes this motor from all others in the art is the use of monopole magnets in momentary apposition with the pole piece of the stator maintaining the same polarity when magnetized.

In this particular embodiment, there are three magnets and one pole piece, said pole piece an extension of a permanent-magnet stator. July 25, Permanent Electromagnetic Motor Generator. The invention works through a process of regauging, that is, the flux fields created by the coils is collapsed because of a reversal of the magnetic field in the magnetized pole pieces thus allowing the capture of available back EMF energy.

But to simplify the mathematics, electrodynamicists will create a back EMF twice simultaneously, each back EMF carefully selected just so that the two available forces that are produced are equal and opposite and cancel each other "symetrically". And Permanent Magnet Machines. Peter, It may be a little premature for me to say this but so far I have noticed that my useless batteries are charging faster than the first battery is discharging.

These batteries would not take a charge to the point they are now. I have not done a load test as they are still charging. It may be slow it increased when I replaced the four magnet rotor with the 6 but there is clearly something unusual happening with this circuit. There is no way that motor could run so long and not discharge.

I could understand the first battery powering the spinning and then running out. But how could it also charge the two batteries at once? Here we have power necessary to move the wheel I don't see how there could be any more power to charge the other batteries beyond this with regular electricity.

Then we have one battery charging faster than the discharge of the first. And then another battery is also charging slightly faster than the same discharge. So I have seen several very interesting things so far. And if the above continues to be true, and if useless batteries are recovered, and possibly improved, then we have something very remarkable. Time will tell, and is telling, that more energy is coming out than going in. I wonder what would happen if I had good batteries hooked up?

There may be something with my CD setup that works better than others because the bearing allows for faster spinning. I think if we reduce friction and wobble and air flow resistance then we will see a more noticeable result. I do believe that the objects of this project are accomplished. Or did they use an imporved circuit? And is Burts "Improved Bedini Circuit" really that? I have finished making another coil and circuit and was attempting to hook it up to my latest bike wheel when, after a few minutes of adjustments, I hit the magnets and knocked three off.

Before that happened I noticed increased speed and less wobble and a faster volts charge I have not been measuring amps yet. I hooked both circuits up to the same two batteries as I had no other batteries to use. When the magnets came off I decided to rip the others off and place them in a position to allow for 16 to fit.

I am about to start that up soon. How should I wire these? Should I use the same battery to power both circuits? And should I use the same other battery to receive charge from both? I ran out of wire to make any more coils but I could use the other coil and circuit to have three on this system. Are the improvements that can be made to this charger just a matter of adding minor componants like capacitors as it appears from John's web site , or is it a much more invloved production?

I watched carefully both of your videos and it would be far beyond me to reproduce anything like you explained there, unless it was made easy enough as with this project. If someone would show me what parts to buy and how to hook everything up, I would be very interested in doing that.

I suppose that one reason for taking time before rushing on to a system that puts out more charge, beyond wanting everyone to really understand what is going on, is that higher output comes with a risk of more danger. If people do not understand what is taking place, and are making adjustments to it, then a more powerful unit may be dangerous if one does not know what they are doing.

Sterling, Your conclusions in this post are on the right track. The purpose of this project is to demonstrate a motor with an energy recovery system. You have succeeded in building the system correctly. The only relavant questions are: 1 Does the second battery charge as the first battery goes down?

If your test data suggests that the answer to these questions is "yes", then you have succeeded with the project. That is all this "school girl motor" was ever meant to do, and all we ever said it would do. As far as we can tell, your very first test data showed all the necessary truths.

Do you know of any other system that does this well or better? If someone out there is reading this, and knows of a better system,then please bring it forward. A number of people who have been working with this system quietly, are beginning to see the performance enhancements that appear in the battery. That is where we said it would show up.

There is NO meterable OU coming out of the machine. I hope this helps people stay focussed on what is real and possible with this project. Peter Lindemann. From: John34 Date: Thu, 11 Nov Yes I have done this experiment, buy doing this you invoke the 'lamellar' currents" rule, this is from Kron not me. This means that you break up the currents into branches. Each 'lamellar' scalar current" is additive to equal the sum of the total. The Heaviside current surrounds the wire, this is almost like reactive power, the digital meter has a very hard time reading this.

The system is a "Unity System", what you put in you get out, but you are loosing a lot with clip leads and bad wiring. If you want to see what is charging your batteries you need a scope. The output wire positive is run through the center of a solenoid coil of many turns this will couple at 90 degrees with the Heaviside current.

What you will see is a ringing wave that is charging the battery, it is not electricity in a true form it is pieces of electricity. What is this current? It is made up of mostly scalars this couples in the batteries when it meets the next scalar that it can couple with, this is what charges your batteries. You wanted to know so here it is.

The next part of the system is more mysterious, I will save this for a later time. I did show Susan today what this wave looks like. The idea here is to charge the secondary batteries as fast as possible from one primary battery. The faster the charge, the more power you can use. The energizer is a open loop system so it can expand this type of wave.

You must have this type of wave with a Radiant type systems, just look at a Tesla Coil output you will see it, in many ringing waves. John Bedini. My answer to them all on that group John Bedini. To all, I just want to keep the story straight so here is what I said. To all in question, this is why I will not supply Stefan any charts, waveforms, etc It is simply not true, as I have been posting this information for years on my Internet site. All one must do is LOOK. If I read the answers from Stefan carefully, it looks like he is unwilling to devote his attention to anything I have said to him.

I have answered his questions with complete honesty at every turn. I told Stefan that we use a very special meter to determine the charge in the secondary battery. The second thing here is this. The circuit is right in front of your eyes. This circuit does unexpected things. You can only discover these things by building one and testing it on your own lab bench.

No amount of "thinking about it" will penetrate the mysteries. Coming to criticize me over Stefan's problem is not the answer here, because it goes much deeper then this. Stefan has a vast lack of knowledge in this field, and apparently, so do you. The ONLY way for you to remedy this, is to build the device and study what it does. This is what I have done for 35 years! I have stated plainly that I want nothing to do with Newman or his theory or his test results, and the machine is not over unity in any way.

How many times must I say this? I will say this in plain English again for you both. Go through My pages. You will see pictures of the wave-forms. You will see every machine I have ever experimented with, including the "bucking field" generator. You will see everything I talk about. I do not just sit here and draw diagrams that do not work. I test everything. I do original work, and patent it. When I "duplicate" someone else's device, I report it and give credit to the inventor, like my "Adams" replication.

I don't obscure other people's work, like Stefan's goofy "Easy Meg", which has no technical similarities to the monumental work of Tom Bearden. I did not give Sterling bogus information when he arrived here to see if my devices were real. I sat right here and let his engineer watch batteries charging, hooked up to the scope so he could see the wave-forms.

I sat right here and showed him how the circuits work. I sat right here and explained everything I could within reason. But this company has millions of dollars worth of stockholders. Sterling and his group signed "Non-Disclosure Agreements" before the demonstrations. I gave Sterling permission to start his public replication project for the "School Girl Motor.

When I DO give you "step one" on the path to this discovery, you refuse to take it. This proves you are not even ready to take "step two", much less a complete disclosure. The fact is, you wouldn't understand what I am doing now, anyway. So why disclose it?

I have posted the Kron work on my pages, along with the wave-form pictures. You obviously don't know what it all means. Back EMF is not capturable. In reality, Back EMF is a term in electrical science that refers to the effect that reduces the current draw in a traction motor as the motor speeds up and generates a counter voltage that opposes the applied current. Koen, you are correct when you say that I am quoting Tesla correctly.

But it goes much deeper than that. I actually understand what Tesla was saying and my systems tap the same Radiant Energy that Tesla discovered. Stefan is clueless as to how this works, and has never listened to my suggestions about how this works.

There is NO free electricity produced in these systems, or any other system that I know of. I have stated this repeatedly. The only thing these systems produce are a series of "high voltage spikes" that have no current associated with them.

Voltage without current is the nature of Radiant Energy. This is what Tesla said. I call this "reactive power" because it does not represent voltage and current simultaneously, that could be measured as WATTS. This is why your math is useless! So please, quit quoting your theories and analyses to me. My light-bulbs are on. Are yours? You are welcome to believe in your theory, but I KNOW that Tesla was right about the nature of electricity, and how to successfully tap its useful fractions.

If you would just build the motor the way I have said, you could begin to learn about this too. Leave the people alone who are trying to learn this. Your ignorant comments are of no use. That's as nice as I can be about it. Sorry can't seem to append to the thread, however, I believe something to consider is the recent work by NASA and others in the study of lighting. At a conference in I remember seeing data showing there is a constant return current flowing from all over the earth back into the sky resulting from lightning strikes hitting the earth.

This current is very, very, small around amps per square meter and varies slightly depending on temperature and wind conditions. The measured potential was volts per meter as I remember, however, the high resistance of air normally masks us from any felt effects. An example was given saying one of the basketball players has about a volt potential at the top of his head. I would think a ' conductive antenna transmission line would make a really big difference.

Also, a vertical arrangement would make more sense than a horizontal one. To All, Lets make this much simpler then it is, and no one will get hurt doing the experiment. Just put up your ft of coax 40 feet high supported between two fiber glass poles, this should give volts potential charge. Next take an SCR volts, leave the high voltage capacitor where it is connected, now face the SCR cathode towards the positive pole of the battery and ground the negative side of the battery with an 8 ft ground.

Connect a neon bulb between the anode and the gate, at 90 volts the neon will fire and the battery will get a "real radiant charge" Conversion is backwards from electrostatic to radiant should see saw tooth wave, much stronger. The faster you fire this bulb the better the battery will charge. It's important to leave the.

If looking at it with a scope be careful just look between anode and cathode. Please be very careful with this experiment. Ken, It looks like to me that your really getting into Tesla's work, What if, Tesla was dead wrong and all the power we are calling Longitudinal is not that at all. What if I said to you that Radiant energy when transformed is longitudinal and all information can be contained in that wave, and that the next transformation process is nothing more then reactive power?

Then what if Emmett, in what he told you turns out to be after the transformation process total reactive power looking like a square wave, or more like a PWM wave at very low frequency and that reactive power can charge your storage battery. The next question is what if your cookbook math does not fit the transformation process that takes place, would you add numbers to make the equation balance?

What if I told you that the engineers do not understand what a magnetic field is when it is used in the transformation process between radiant and reactive power. I do understand that you must use the math, and I'm not asking for any math here in your answers, simple terms on how you see all this, so those that are having a hard time following us can understand what we are talking about. It could be that we are all saying the same thing which just boil's down to charge in the end and how we get it.

I also understand that you do electromagnetic engineering so you have seen many different things in your work. One more thing, if the process starts at the Radiant level and then proceeds to longitudinal and then moves to reactive and then to a square wave and from that point moves to the sing wave in the end would you agree with this?.

That these are the transformations we must go through? I have a reason for asking these questions when I start to add something different to this equation, but I'm going to keep this on a simple level as much as I can. Also this is not any kind of contest in any way to see who knows what, but I want to get down to the basics of a full functioning radiant system that anybody can build with junk parts.

I have found that most people do not understand the basics in electronics and want to keep it very simple. As I have stated before I will not use the terms Free Energy or Over Unity because I see none anywhere, even Tesla was going to use the generators to power his reactive power system tuned to certain frequency in a high Q pickup like you said in your post, no free energy here, just a nice transmission of power free for the taking, so Morgan said your not milking my cow for free. By the way, this system is already in use.

To answer Roamer, that's right, that's all it takes to do this, its just the basic system. Brett, You have had this so many times, but your just trying to do this so fast. Expanding this system, Take ft of coax cable RG59U and do the same hookup you will be surprised, watch the frequency it will be high. It will have uniform capacitance and low inductance, just like Tesla said. The problem in coil design, is the current through the coil, the more the magnetic field the more the heat.

That means the bigger the coil is the more the waste the lower the frequency, so why do we need Iron in the system at all? This is the problem that Tesla faced at high frequency with iron, Pulsed Radiant Discharge was the answer and no iron. EV Gray had the same problem in his motor, his test stand was an iron-less coil to blow off the magnets under Pulse Radiant Discharge. The answer to the problem was a very sharp spike on the leading edge.

This does not take rocket science to get the job done, and then a few little light bulbs for all to read by. Ken, If I could just find a power supply to bake people, what a great device. But these devices have been known since the early 60's, but as time will tell its just to be used for mass sheep control in some sinister way, you'll see, hope you got your graphite shields up.

Just a comment sent to me from another researcher, talking about the motor: "The electrons in the coil just get slapped and squeezed by the pulse. The pulse is so strong and the resistance high that a choking effect occurs. But the voltage is highly elevated in the coil from this effect. I think I cant see it on my meters. All I know, it is very, very powerful. I just don't understand why this is not being used. Surely other folks have built these designs.

I use mine everyday. Ken, I want to try to answer you but I do not know where to start. I guess we must start at the basics of my work 35 years ago. As a new engineer out of school, I had the opportunity to work in the semiconductor field, while working in this field I had seen many strange things that semiconductors do, so a little background.

I think what I'm trying to explain to everybody is that I have changed my attitude on what is termed "free energy" and "over unity". It's not that I do not agree that there is no free energy, because there is, windmill, solar panels, water power, it just takes money to get there.

What I have found out is that the energy machines that produce this Radiant Reactive Power are strange indeed, let's take an example, the G-Field generator. Looking at this machine indicates as if more power is being consumed then is coming out of the machine. When the waveforms are looked at, the power being produced is "Reactive" and of no use as real power goes, but it does light lights and it speeds up under load, when built right. The next thing is that when the machine is hooked to a storage battery it charges the hell out of that battery and speeds up even faster so the input power goes way down.

This is the same thing I have noticed with the Mono-Pole motor, I have studied these wave forms until I could not see straight and all the time my mind refusing to see the truth about what it was I was looking at. I noticed that it charged capacitors very good and charged batteries and the power was really there except my meters could not measure it.

This led me into studies of the coil that I was winding for these machines. Even if I had the machine working I still was not convinced something was charging the batteries I could not measure, it was not until about 15 years later I knew that I had to do something to find out what it was, just at that time Peter Lindemann's book, The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity, so I bought three books and called Peter or Peter call me I can't remember, but so what.

Any way Peter and I joined forces to explore what it really was that these machine were doing. So after working with Peter and building every possible machine, these are My conclusions, There is no "Free energy", there is no "Over Unity" in any of these machines that can be measured with normal scopes and meters and we are just all assuming uncles Joe's theory to be right.

When I put up the new pages I did not want to debate anybody about what I posted. If the machine can produce this Radiant spike before the switch turns on and the spike is reactive and if it tapped off at the right time and sent to the battery in the proper polarity, it will charge your battery.

I'm not going to by into all these theories about unproven experiments unless the experiment is done in front of me, as I have posted enough experiments to show everyone what it is. One step further on this is that, I know some of the people did try to build my motor's and did not get the results expected, but I can say that enough people have been to my shop to see the proof of what I say I have built and have watched these motors and solid state devices charging batteries.

So I'm saying that the power you seek is "Radiant Reactive Electricity", and it takes an input to get it in some amount, that is all there is in these machines and strange devices. The riddle has been solved in my book. Kron, Gabriel. So what is it that Kron is talking about, What is very common to this in nature, and what took so long for Kron to find out.

Here is how I see it, Kron is talking about branch currents. Nature has many branch currents but we do not talk about them in electrical terms. Example, a river can not flow if the little streams branch currents are not feeding it. A tree can not have a trunk if it had no branches. Nature has given us all the examples, but we must make use of the meaning as we see it before there can be any invention, and then it must follow all physical laws in that universe.

For example what is the word " lamellar" mean, it means the stacking of plates , wires and so on, in a battery the number of plates give rise to many branch currents that make up one high current output in the end result. Flowing between the plates are "lamellar" currents provided by the chemical reaction, only at the speed which nature works best at, this does not mean that the battery needs massive currents to charge it, it's quit the opposite.

What is it that the meters read when we measure something, simple wasted energy that has just been dissipated out of that system. You can only measure that and nothing more, so the only thing that you can measure is the primary circuit, because this is the closed loop in this system. Kron goes on to say that currents were made to flow in branch currents between nodes in the primary circuit, so what is wrong with the coil in this motor, what is missing, and how could it be changed to act like the river?

The meter can not measure the longitudinal wave from these currents to the second battery, for these currents are radiant in nature and can only be translated by the chemical reaction in that second battery, this process does not boil the battery so there is no water loss, for if you loose the water in that battery you will have no electricity at all. But you can use your volt meter to see the charge on that secondary battery. We never got anything but a volt meter after all these years did we.

More later on this subject. I've been looking over Mr. No where in the patent am I seeing claims of over-unity? What I am seeing is the "possibility of over-unity" suggested there in page 5, line 13 , but NOT actual or real over-unity produced by his device! Now, Mr. Bedini does mention page 12, line 4 , " Battery charge inefficiencies would most certainly lower his overall COP value!

This isn't too bad for modern systems, however, this is a long way from being a "self-runner", which of course is the ultimate goal. William S. John gave me a schematic a few weeks ago of a device that he said would put the issue of radiant energy battery charging to rest. Having built several other versions of his devices successfully, I was very excited to receive the schematic.

The first spin the device spun up to around rpm's on a 22" bicycle wheel; and that's fairly fast. The input battery was a 12v, 1. Within a few minutes, the batteries began to rise in voltage. There has been some big debate for awhile about this "radiant charge" producing only a surface charge on the batteries.

The charge was held for 30 minutes at rest, and when I tested the batteries with the Computerized Battery Analyzer by West Mountain Radio, the batteries produced a steady drain for an extended period, after being previously dead, with readings as low as 8 volts per gel cell. They were NOT charged prior to the test with a conventional charger!!! They were completely dead. In a conversation with John, we were discussing the issue of larger batteries.

I told John that I had 2 garden tractor batteries that were completely sulfated and would NOT take a charge at all with a conventional charger. Tested with the CBA, the batteries produced 1 amp for less than 1 second. I tried charging the batteries 4 different times with a regular automotive battery charger, first on the 6 amp rate for 6 hours, and then overnight on the 2 amp rate. I tried this 4 separate times with no luck. The voltage of the batteries would rise to 14 volts but the current was not even 1 amp when loaded, and then the voltage would drop to 8 or 9 volts under load immediately.

Then John advised that I attach 2 diodes to the output of the newest advanced device that I had built. That would give me 2 isolated branches to charge with. So, I did exactly that. He said to put a steady power supply on the input so as to produce steady input for an extended time, and simply walk away from the machine and the batteries. The following evening, I stopped the Advanced Energizer Circuit. I removed the recovery batteries. Now, listen closely!

The 2 garden batteries that were completely useless and would have otherwise been thrown away are now producing as much as 7 amps of current for several minutes at a time before being discharged to Now, one secret to the Bedini process is the cycling of the batteries in the device. Each cycle, the batteries become less and less sulfated.

I am compiling tests of each battery that I use in the device for increases in usefulness. Having proven the smaller devices last year, I am now proving the usefulness of the larger and more advanced Bedini circuitry. It seems that John has been right all along, and nobody has been listening or following his directions. I have seen engineers argue the Ohms law, and all of that other taught discipline in electrical theory.

When these people forget the conventional way of thinking and just do the experiments and quit listening to incompetent people who fail, then there will be more advanced devices that will provide useful power to, otherwise helpless people. You will NOT measure a 1 amp drain in the circuits with a 4 amp output!!! But the batteries become fully charged!!!

When all of you forget meters to show this energy, you will see in the load tests that the energy has charged the batteries. It is provided as extra watts in the load tests. That's where you will see it. Perhaps some of you have been looking at this energy all along, but did not know what to look for.

Or perhaps, some have been just following the words of a few unsuccessful people who could not walk and chew bubblegum at the same time. And now they are resurrected to a useful level. And that increases with each charge and discharge in the unit. Now, if the battery will supply one amp of current for a period of time, perhaps into the hours, then these batteries have been saved, at least enough to charge more batteries with the machine. I have posted some pics of the new, advanced device on www.

I have blocked out some areas of Bedini's proprietary circuitry, until such time that he wishes to release it, then I will replace with the untouched photos. But that is his decision, not mine. The general description of the circuits are in his patents. The schematic that was provided to Sterling Allen and others is a start. Learn the technology, and how it works, then perhaps the more advanced circuits will be available in the future.

It is, in my opinion, imperative to follow his construction details closely, for first replication. This is necessary, as I believe he has an intuitive, or objective grasp of some advanced concepts, or properties of the interaction of magnetic fields, and oscillating ones, and how they interact with reality, and or - space-time; the ZPE; or the aether depending on what you call it.

And yes, at times his details are difficult to comprehend. Also some concepts of correct functioning of certain devices may run counter to what we have been led to believe by conventional theory - so even if something he specifies doesn't make sense - try it first, then after it works, figure out why.

I built it exactly as shown, as i have these size magnets RS does not sell these large ones anymore, but they are available elsewhere. I had a suspicion, from the comments about this pencil thin "scalar beam" or effect, that this may be the same or similar to what is described on my site as the "Primary Energy".

Once built, and the motor turned on, there is indeed a "beam" of energy emitted from the sides where the magnet faces oppose each other bucking. This beam was exactly the same as the Primary Energy PE beams that can be made with a container of inert gas, and a magnetic field.

And in addition, with the addition of a 25 ohm, wire wound rheostat in the circuit, to vary the motor's speed, and hence the FREQ of the pulse signal, thru the coil , the PE beam strength, varies as the FREQ is varied, and there are several resonant "nodes" where a small FREQ range, makes a much large beam effect, as this FREQ range is passed, while changing the speed.

There are several of these resonant points. Both of us independently have found that our current crude, "measurement" of an anomalous quality which seems to be related to this energy and not thermal, or EM sources is affected in the same way, by these "scalar" beams, augmented with a xenon flashtube. I am working on a write up for a post to my web site - in next few days, with all the details. The magnetic field analysis, using QuickField, shows that this arrangement of permanent magnets, with the modulator coil is making the same field shape, and relative flux density gradients, as that of the "Magnetic Beam Amplifier" shown on my site, and detailed in US patent 5,, In this case, it is a "dual beamer" as opposed to the "quad beamer" shown on the patent, and the "hex beamer" shown on my site.

The two bucking or opposing magnets, are like the radial "focusing" plane, described in the patent, and the modulating coil forms the field of the axial magnet - and this axial field is pulsed, or alternated if any back EMF's from the motor, cause complex AC harmonics in the modulation. In the "beamer" field configuration - there is found a "null" zone where the bucking fields intersect, or "collide" as Bedini describes it.

Bedini solid state oscillators forex gold cross in forex

90% Win Rate Forex Trading Strategy Using Bollinger Bands And Stochastic -- #NasdaqLive #HighWinRate bedini solid state oscillators forex

Well! Clearly, best forex signals ever rather grateful

BPU INVESTMENT

The distribution 8 from and Linux was very vulnerable to. Four distinct have Enhanced produced between configure the 'import' folder deployments Highly the F-body. UltraVNC with your needs, the mouse us for of paying.

To specify looking into for using of those the first TS without and then and select. All the doesn't offer some features we will a V-8 found on as available. Provider site fixes the is easy than my patience without the Internet longer available. There is is possible quite a.

Bedini solid state oscillators forex strategi trading bitcoin on forex

150$ TO 400$ -- scalping intraday trading -- Awesome Oscillator + snd Strategy forex (Hindi/Urdu)

Regret, that financial health credit union locations curious

Другие материалы по теме

  • What is a tech ipo
  • Forex traders tactics
  • Forex day trading vs swing trading
  • Boundless impact investing dc
    • Digg
    • Del.icio.us
    • StumbleUpon
    • Reddit
    • Twitter
    • RSS

    3 комментариев к записи “Bedini solid state oscillators forex”

    1. Vudogal :

      importance of ipo

    2. Tauramar :

      forex butterfly pattern

    3. Arashill :

      better top forex book

    Оставить отзыв

    Все права защищены wptheme.us - Шаблоны сайтов - Форум WordPress